Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Will Malaysians choose the Red Pill or the Blue Pill?



Morpheus: It is the world that has been pulled over your eyes to blind you from the truth.
Neo: What truth?
Morpheus:That you are a slave, Neo. Like everyone else you were born into bondage. Into a prison that you cannot taste or see or touch. A prison for your mind.
Morpheus:This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill - the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill - you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes. (The Matrix)

Malaysians have taken the road of racism for 57 years because our minds have been imprisoned. A leader may show us a path to a better tomorrow but we will miss the turning if we cannot liberate ourselves from the prison of our minds. Only by choosing good over evil can we see the true path. The time for choosing has come.
  
After seven days hearing submissions from the defense and the prosecution, the five Federal Court Judges will decide whether to acquit or convict Anwar Ibrahim. If Anwar is convicted, he will be imprisoned for a term that will end his political career. The opposition leader said this is his final sacrifice, his last final service for Malaysians. He will not be silenced. But will Malaysians grasp the opportunity he paid for with his freedom?

Whether there are flying carpets, briyani suits and what happened to the missing KY jelly is for the court to decide. The target audience for the remake of the stage production of Sodomy I, updated by DNA forensic investigation replacing the old fashion mattress prop, is not the court. It is always the Malaysian public especially the Malay Muslims. The impresario, whoever he or she may be, thought Malaysians are either gullible or easily intimidated or both. Now Malaysians will show whether they are indeed a timid and feeble-minded audience or they are bold and resolute judges firmly punishing evil and rewarding the good. Malaysians will have to decide whether to take the red pill or the blue pill.

The red pill and its opposite, the blue pill are popular culture symbols representing the choice between embracing the sometimes painful truth of reality (the red pill) and the blissful ignorance of illusion (the blue pill). The term is popularized in the 1999 film, “The Matrix”, where the main character Neo (Keanu Reeves) is offered the choice between a red pill and a blue pill. The blue pill would allow him to remain living in the “ignorance of illusion”, while the red pill would lead to living in the “truth of reality” even though it is a harsher, more difficult life.

Americans chose the red pill when Martin Luther King Jr was shot. The civil rights movement marched on because they knew oppressors would never give up their privileges on their own. President Johnson in his speech before Congress to pass the Voting Rights Bill allowing men and women to vote whatever the colour of their skin said:

“The real hero of this struggle is the American Negro. His actions and protests, his courage to risk safety and even to risk his life, have awakened the conscience of this Nation. His demonstrations have been designed to call attention to injustice, designed to provoke change, designed to stir reform.”

In 2008, America elected a president based not on the colour of his skin but on the content of his character. They had overcome.

South Africans chose the red pill when Nelson Mandela was imprisoned. For the 27 years he was in jail, South Africans continued his struggle for freedom and equal opportunity. They fought for the idea, which Nelson Mandela in his statement from the dock said:

“Was one he cherished, he hoped to live for but if needs be which he was prepared to die for.”

Internal resistance to apartheid came from organizations dedicated to peaceful protests, passive resistance and armed insurrections. It came from Steve Biko, Bishop Desmond Tutu, white activists like Harry Schwarz, Joe Slovo and Trevor Huddleston. It came from the Black Sash, an organization of white women against apartheid. It came from students and churches. In 1994 the long walk for freedom was finally over, apartheid ended.

Anwar chose the red pill 16 years ago when he rejected the offer to go away quietly and instead took the path of “reformasi”. It took him from the heights of being the acting Prime Minister to the depth of being the lowest convict. On his release from prison, he crafted the New Economic Agenda for affirmative action based on needs and not on race and to restore the country’s international competitiveness. On his qualification to stand for election, he announced on 15 April 2008 at Kelab Sultan Sulaiman Kampong  Baru, the venue where Malay nationalists gathered to fight for independence, that while the constitutional rights of Malays would be protected, it was time to change from “Ketuanan Melayu” to “Ketuanan Rakyat”, The Eight of March  2008 General Election proved to be the birth of a new era where the mill stone of race and religion which had been Malaysians’ burden to bear was finally shattered and transformed the political landscape of the nation. In 2013, Pakatan Rakyat secured 89 parliament seats and won 52% of the popular vote but was thwarted by gerrymandering, malapportionment and unfair electoral practices from forming the government.     

When Anwar chose to awaken Malaysians to give them hope that there can be another Malaysia, he was fully aware he would be challenging the twin pillars of UMNO politics, the first is Malay unity must be maintained at all costs and the second is that UMNO’s dominant political position must be maintained. Anwar was aware that those who left UMNO would be ostracized and made an outcast of his community. UMNO had accused Dato’ Onn Jaafar, the father of Malay nationalism and founder of UMNO as having sold out Malay rights and his heritage when he formed the multi-racial Independence of Malaya Party (IMP). Dato’ Haji Zainal Abidin bin Haji Abas, who with Dato’ Onn was one of UMNO’s founders and its first General Secretary became another example of UMNO’s punitive deterrence. He left UMNO to join IMP and later became the chairman of the United Democratic Party. He was completely alienated from the community. Aziz Ishak, once out of UMNO was hounded, all kinds of charges were laid against him and he was later arrested under the Internal Security Act. However, nothing prepared Anwar for what they did to him, he was arrested, beaten, imprisoned, ridiculed and denigrated by scurrilous attacks against him and his family, ostracized, made an outcast and labeled a traitor to his own race. The rancorousness of the venom, the ferocity of the hatred and the viciousness of the attacks were at levels never seen before. He is now more prepared mentally but physically he is not as strong and as young as he was one and a half decades ago.   

If you choose the blue pill you will carry on in your blissful ignorance of illusion.

You can choose to ignore and jettison the teachings of your religion, Islam, Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism or other faith and ignore your conscience not to harm your fellow men or to help him because the “common good” of your race demands that you disregard the needs of those of a different colour or religion. But what are you going to say to Him on the Final Day when he reminded you in the 179th verse of the 7th Chapter:

“And We have certainly created for Hell many of the jinn and mankind. They have hearts with which they do not understand, they have eyes with which they do not see, and they have ears with which they do not hear. Those are like livestock; rather, they are more astray. It is they who the heedless.”

The illusion however, demands that your life as an individual belongs not to you but to the group or society and in this case, to your race of which you are merely a part, that you have no rights and  must sacrifice your rights, your values and goals for the greater good of your race.

The illusion further demands you are not to question why but to do and die. You are not to question what is the greater good for the Malays for one person to control Malakoff Corporation, Gas Malaysia, Aliran Ihsan Resources (water utility), Port of Tanjong Pelepas, Johor Port, Senai Airpor Terminal Services, SMART Tunnel, MMC-Gamuda, Proton Bhd, Edaran Otomobil Nasional, MODENAS, Honda Malaysia, Bank Muamalat, PUSPAKOM, Alam Flora, POS Malaysia, Defence Technologies, Tradewinds (M) Bhd which subsidiary BERNAS has a monopoly of rice importation and distribution, Central Sugar Refinery and smaller stakes in Malaysia Sugar Manufacturing which together holds a monopoly for sugar, hotels and property development companies.    
     
The illusion demands that the individual sacrifice you are called upon to make is for the common good for the greatest number of your race. Your income from 2009 has risen by only 8.1% while your household expenditure increased by 12.1% and 88.6% from 1994. Your household expenditure for housing, water, electricity has gone up by 102% since 1994, transport 94.6%, food and drinks by 60.9% while your household debt has increased by 13%. It is difficult to make ends meet with the increased price of petrol, the higher tolls for privatized highways and bridges, the tariffs for the privatized water and electricity, even your rubbish and sewage collection have been privatized. You have no idea how to pay the increased school bus fares but you will be proud that you have contributed to the many monopolies owned by Syed Mokthar Al-Bukhari, one of you.  

The illusion says your sacrifice in being unable to afford your own home is for the greater good. While you are seeking to rent a house, the rent-seeking elite buys luxury bungalows and condominiums. After payment of the car installments, credit cards, food and other bills you have no money for emergencies much less a holiday while the elites are flying first class and staying in five star hotels.

The illusion says your government has provided your children with a university education but they are not employable. The June 2014 World Bank Malaysian Economic Monitor reports 60% of the unemployed are aged 20-24 and 25% are graduates. Your children hold a university degree but employers find they lack soft skills; 47% inability to work independently, 49% lack problem solving skills, 51% lack analytical skills, 56% lack creative/critical thinking and 81% lack communication skills. According to the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012 Malaysian students rank 52 out of 65 countries and the bottom one-third among more than 70 countries in international assessments like Trends in International Mathematics and Science Studies (TIMMS). The results show the education standard of our 15 year olds are three years behind Singapore, Korea, China, Japan and even Vietnam.    

No matter how you seek to justify you cannot ignore that while a responsible government builds a floor for the weakest students to stand, it encourages the best and the brightest to fly as high as they can. It is wicked to clip their wings because 150 years ago their great grand parents came to work in the estates, railroads, tin mines or to seek a better life.

While all accept that the Malays and the natives of Sabah and Sarawak are disadvantaged and neglected under colonial rule for more than 200 years and ought to be assisted what justification is there to allow Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Indonesians and Filipinos who came yesterday to enjoy these same privileges so the elite can maintain power? 

The blue pill unfortunately, will not be able to provide the answers and will not save you from the rude awakening one day when Malaysia ends up like Rwanda, Serbia, Sri Lanka or Zimbabwe.

If you choose the red pill, you will realize the painful truth that you yourself are part of the oppressed and you must fight for your own freedom and not that of the elites who can hardly claim to be identifiable with you.

Your life as an individual belongs to you and you have an inviolable right to live it as you see fit, to act on your own judgment, to pursue the values of your own choosing. The basic tenet is that each individual has an inalienable right to the pursuit of his own happiness in a society where men and women deal with one another as equals. The only happy society is one of happy individuals. We cannot have a healthy forest made up of rotten trees.

You will recognize that no race holds a monopoly of beauty, of intelligence, of strength and there is more than enough room for all in this country. You will understand what Malcolm X said:

“I believe that there will ultimately be a clash between the oppressed and those who do the oppressing. I believe that there will be a clash between those who want freedom, justice and equality for everyone and those who want to continue the system of exploitation. I believe that there will be that kind of clash, but I don’t think it will be based on the colour of the skin”      

Anwar has given Malaysians the keys to the door of change, if Malaysians grab hold of them once opened the door cannot be shut but if Malaysians do not use them once shut the door cannot be opened.

What will you choose reality or illusion?

William Leong Jee Keen
Member of Parliament Selayang
12 November 2014
          
          




Monday, August 11, 2014

MKini报道: 银行债案与水供重组争议 公正党九十页报告批卡立

Sources From: http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/270706
为了说服盟党关于撤换雪州大臣卡立的决定,公正党已呈交一份文件给伊斯兰党,以阐明卡立不再胜任大臣一职的理由,并把重点锁在卡立卷入的伊斯兰银行贷款案与水供重组交易。

这份文件包含附录在内厚达91页,已经交给伊党总秘书慕斯达法阿里。公正党在文件中强调,对“仓促达成的水供重组交易”产生“合理怀疑”。

公正党也质疑,在该党今年1月发动“加影行动”的数周内,卡立旋即“加速”与伊斯兰银行达致庭外和解的协议。

公正党今年初发起“加影行动”,以制造加影补选让公正党实权领袖安华上阵,并计划胜选后取代卡立出任大臣,最后达致入主布城的目标。



中间人受惠雪州计划 

然而,随着安华因肛交案被判监5年,扛起加影行动大旗的任务便辗转落在公正党主席旺阿兹莎身上。

根据上述《当今大马》看过的文件,以时间顺序详列卡立在解决其拖欠伊斯兰银行的5950万令吉债务,涉嫌利益冲突的部分。(截至2013年11月的欠款,未包含利息)

这份文件也声称,有关为诉辩双方穿针引线的人士,在庭外和解达致后不久,就在雪州政府颁发的计划中受惠。

在《当今大马》取得有关人士与相关公司的回应前,故隐其名。

“2月13日,即宣布加影行动的两周后,处于联邦法院阶段的伊斯兰银行上诉卡立欠债案没有继续审讯,因为法院被告知庭外和解正在进行中...。”

“3月19日,丽阳机构(Tropicana Corporation Bhd)宣布,把本身从雪州政府手里买下的308.72亩地段,脱售给(相关公司)。”

“这意味着,雪州原本拥有的308.72亩地段,落在(有关人士)所控制的一家公司手里。”

“3月25日,卡立与(相关公司)签署谅解备忘录,颁发一项计划予他们,以兴建总值5亿9100万令吉的2400个可负担房屋单位。”

与银行达庭外和解 

“3月31日,伊斯兰银行与卡立告诉法院,双造已达致庭外和解,因此同意撤销诉讼。”

伊斯兰银行向大马交易所宣布,尽管该银行的律师相信该银行“相比对手而言,在此案拥有更强有力的理据”,但是该银行却决定不再向卡立追讨债务。



起诉PNB后可还欠债 

卡立较早前受媒体询及此事时,以“私事”为由避答。然而,根据公正党的文件,卡立之前向党内领导层的解释,却引起了质疑。

公正党会议纪录显示,卡立宣称,“有一名来自沙地阿拉伯拉吉哈银行(Al Rajhi Bank)的朋友愿意帮忙,惟恐防泄露详情,故不便相告”。

卡立被指曾辩称,伊斯兰银行撤告的原因是,因为卡立承诺把自己起诉国民投资机构(PNB)所预料得到的钱,用以偿还伊斯兰银行。

“这个解释不合理,也不能为公正党领袖接受,并挑起了合理的怀疑...。”

“放眼全球绝无一家银行愿意撤告,特别是在伊斯兰银行起诉卡立一案,拥有强而有力的理据,(难道会)如同卡立所指般,愿意等另一个法庭谕令(欠债者)支付欠款。”

它补充,在上述会议后的5个月,卡立仍未对国民投资机构采取任何法律行动。

遭到自身政党质疑诚信的卡立,昨天反挑战公正党向大马反贪会举报自己。

罗查里获赔逾5亿元 

此外,公正党游说友党撤换卡立的另一个重点,就是卡立处理的水供重组交易。它指称,这也在加影行动宣布后仓促推动。

公正党争论的其中一点,是雪州政府在最终的水供重组献议中,给雪州水供公司与商业高峰的最大股东罗查里(Rozali Ismail),总值5亿6800万令吉的赔偿。



雪河公司估价削廿亿 

与此同时,另一家特许经营承包商雪河水供公司(Splash)所得到的估价,则被削减了20亿令吉,因此引发“怀疑”。

不但如此,它也质疑,尽管水供重组尚未敲定,但是中央政府梦寐已久的冷岳2滤水厂数十亿令吉计划却已经获得批准。

委任拉惹柏特拉弟弟

另外,这份文件也阐明,部落客拉惹特拉(Raja Petra Kamaruddin)曾撰文指责公正党实权领袖安华与策略主任拉菲兹,暗中得到雪河水供公司的佣金。

“拉惹柏特拉的弟弟,正是卡立在雪州政府的得力助手——拉惹依德利斯(Raja Idris Kamaruddin)。卡立也委任拉惹依德利斯为雪州政府投资臂膀——达鲁依山集团的总执行长。”
 
“许多企图抹黑公正党的报导,皆始于拉惹柏特拉的部落格。唯有卡立(及其心腹官员如前政治秘书法依卡)知道的机密讯息,在卡立知悉后的数小时内上载至部落格。”

这份公正党文件也提到其他内容如下:

—卡立原则上批准金白大道计划,违反民联减少收费站的政策。

—虽然卡立成功减少中间人,但是雪州的公共设备与服务不尽人意。

—不愿花费中央拨款来修路;以及,

——决定调高商业执照费。

Friday, July 25, 2014

MP Selayang Speech on Special Parliamentary Session: Debate on the MH17 Tragedy

Special Parliamentary Session: Debate on the MH17 Tragedy

The Honourable Tan Sri Speaker,

On 17 July 2014, flight MH17 from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur was believed to have been shot down by a surface to air missile near the Ukrainian Russian border, killing 298 innocent men, women and children. It was murder and a crime against humanity. Shock, grief and anger are felt throughout the world. The whole world condemns this senseless shooting down of MH17. It cannot be forgotten. It cannot be forgiven and it cannot be allowed to happen again.

I extend on behalf of my colleagues from Keadilan and Pakatan Rakyat, our condolences and deepest sympathies to the family members and friends of the passengers and crew of flight MH17.
I acknowledge with gratitude the Honourable Prime Minister’s quiet efforts in obtaining Alexander Borodai’s agreement, the separatist leader having control of the wreckage site, to release 282 bodies to Netherlands and for the bodies of Malaysian citizens to be sent home. It was an audacious move but it produced a good outcome.

I also thank the Australian Government, especially its foreign minister Ms Julie Bishop, for her tireless efforts in obtaining the UN Security Council members’ unanimous approval to her resolution calling for a complete international investigation into the downing of the MH17, demanding the responsible parties to be held to account and for the separatists to refrain from compromising the integrity of the crash site.
Although the UN Security Council has called for a thorough investigation, there are still many challenges and much to be done before the victims of MH17 and their families obtain justice.

Malaysia is entitled to commence an action before the International Court of Justice against those responsible for breaching Article 3 of the Chicago Convention in attacking a civilian aircraft. This will be claim for compensation and damages. Although the compensation will help the victims’ families, money is not an adequate substitute for the lives so cruelly taken away. The perpetrators must answer for their crime. The perpetrators must be given a severe punishment, one that reflects the horrific viciousness and cruelty of their senseless crime.

What the perpetrators committed is a war crime. Under the laws of war, combatants must distinguish between a military and a civilian object. Combatants cannot target civilians. It is a rule of international law that combatants must ensure the target is not a civilian aircraft before attacking it. If those who shot the missile were aware that MH17 was a civilian aircraft they have clearly committed a war crime. They have violated International Humanitarian Law and the Geneva Convention for attacking civilians.

Unfortunately, as Lembah Pantai (Nurul Izzah Anwar) has pointed out, Malaysia is not a signatory to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and therefore not a member of the International Criminal Court (“ICC”) that is empowered to investigate and prosecute crimes against humanity and war crimes.

Malaysia must therefore depend on the UN Security Council to refer the case to the ICC. Malaysia has to call on the 15 UN Security Council members in particular the 5 permanent members to carry out their responsibility by exercising their powers to allow a complete investigation. They must find the political will not to protect or obstruct these criminals from being prosecuted.

Unfortunately, history has shown that politics often come in the way of justice. There have been no less than 40 incidents of civilian air planes having been shot down by military forces but no one has been charged much less convicted.

On 27 July 1955 an Israeli commercial flight was shot down by Bulgaria, all 58 passengers and 7 crew members were killed. Israel’s suit before the International Court of Justice failed because it did not have jurisdiction over Bulgaria which was not a party to the convention.

On 21 February 1973, Israel shot down Arab Airlines Libya carrying 113 passengers of which 108 were killed. No one was charged.

On 1 September 1983, USSR shot down Korean flight KL007. The Soviet Union suppressed evidence and the flight recorder sought by investigators were only released 8 years after the Soviet Union collapsed.
On 3 July 1988, a US warship at the Persian Gulf shot down Iranian Airline flight 655 killing all 290 aboard. The majority of the passengers were on the way to Mecca to perform the Haj. There is evidence to suggest USA failed to take steps to identify the air plane. USA did not admit responsibility although it paid compensation on an “ex-gratia” basis.               

In these circumstances, Malaysia faces a huge challenge to prosecute the perpetrators. I call on the Prime Minister and the Government to stand firm before the two Great Powers, America and Russia in demanding justice for the victims of MH17.

I hope US President Barrack Obama will act in accordance with the words of his speech given in Belgium on 26 March 2014 that the United States will respect and will act together with the small nations to enforce international law. He said:
“And our enduring strength is also reflected in our respect for an international system that protects the rights of both nations and people – a United Nations and a Universal Declaration of Human Rights, international law and the means to enforce these laws. But we also know that those laws are not self-executing. They depend on people and nations of good will continually affirming them…so that majorities cannot simply suppress minorities and big countries cannot simply bully the small”

President Obama was speaking about Russia’s violation of international law regarding Ukraine and the pro-Russian separatists but the violation of international law in the shooting down of MH17 is just as serious if not more. So I hope President Obama will enforce international law against the perpetrators whoever they may be.

I also hope that Russian President Vladimir Putin will also live up to what he said. He said no country should use the MH17 tragedy for their “narrowly selfish political goals” and to provide full co-operation to the experts investigating the tragedy. It is hoped that President Putin will ensure no country will for its own political goal prevent or obstruct the perpetrators of this terrible crime from being brought to justice.

We must ensure this tragedy will not occur again. After the KL007 incident, the international community and ICAO agreed to the Montreal Protocol of 10 May 1984 where pursuant to Article 3 bis States are not to use weapons against civil aircraft in flight. Despite this Protocol, an Air Malawi passenger flight was shot down on 6 November 1987 during the Mozambique civil war, the on US shot down Iranian Air Flight 655 during the Iran-Iraq conflict and on 4 October 2001, a Russian passenger flight with 78 people aboard was shot down by a missile by Ukraine and now MH17. The Montreal Protocol is not sufficient to stop these killings.

The present state of aviation law is insufficient and incomplete to prevent military forces both government and non-government from shooting down civilian aircraft on the ground of national security or self-defense. It is still an era of “might is right.” To destroy a non-threatening civilian aircraft killing innocent passengers and then attempting to justify such a barbaric act by using as an excuse national security is rubbing insult to injustice. There must be a way of preventing such slaughter.    

MH 17 requested Ukrainian Air Traffic Control for permission to climb to 35,000 feet but this was refused and it was directed to maintain its height at 33,000 feet. MH17 was flying over a war zone because everyone from the ICAO to the Ukrainian Air Traffic Controllers thought the combatants did not have the capability to shoot down air planes at this height. All were deadly wrong. If they had known this tragedy would have been avoided.

I suggest a new provision for ICAO to require combatants to declare their military capabilities and to issue a prior warning that the air space is a “no fly zone”. Failure to do so will be a war crime. I suggest Malaysia lead in calling for this change to make the sky a safer place.

The Honourable Prime Minister said this morning “Let us walk together” I answer “We will walk with you to seek the truth and to obtain justice for the victims of MH17” I ask all Malaysians to stand together to bring the criminals to justice and to move as one in making this world a safer place.

I support the motion. Thank you.

William Leong Jee Keen
MP Selayang

23 July 2014

Thursday, April 10, 2014

Passing of GST : Sparing the Rod and Spoiling the BN Government by William Leong Jee Keen Member of Parliament Selayang



On 7th April 2014 with time enough for only 10 MPs on each side to debate, the Goods and Services Tax Bill 2014 was pushed through by a vote of 118 to 81. Malaysians, rich, middle class and poor will from 1st April 2015 pay the same rate of 6% add-on tax on their consumption of goods and services.

Straw man Arguments
The Government relying on their 133 majority offered 2 unconvincing arguments for adopting GST. The first argument is GST will not hurt the people because it replaces the Sales and Services Tax (“SST”) which has higher rates of 10% and 6% respectively. It is a straw man argument. Malaysians will soon painfully discover that this argument is a fallacy. GST is a far more burdensome tax than SST. Unlike SST which is a tax paid at the level of the final production or supply of the service, GST is payable at every level of the supply chain and finally borne by the consumer. GST also applies to many more goods and services than SST. The second argument is that 160 countries have adopted GST and therefore GST must be good. This is a jumping on the bandwagon kind of argument appealing to those with a herd mentality. Those who follow this argument will like the lemmings when they fall off the cliff find out, too late, that the rest of the countries who did not adopt GST or abolished it were right.

Now that parliament has passed GST, I wish to point out three reasons Malaysians should press for GST’s abolition. 5 countries have abolished GST: Vietnam (in the 1970s), Grenada (introduced 1986, dismantled shortly thereafter), Ghana (introduced March 1995, removed two months later), Malta (introduced 1995, removed 1997) and Belize (introduced 1996, removed 1999). [Three of these countries have since reintroduced the tax; Ghana in 1998, Malta and Vietnam in 1999].       

The 1st Reason: GST does not solve the real deficit problem but will make it worse
There is an old saying “spare the rod and spoil the child”. We know it does not apply in Sweden and I offer my sympathies to the Malaysian couple, Shawal Norshal and Azizul Raheem Awalluddin who have been convicted. However, for us in Malaysia, discipline is important. It is more important when it comes to public finances. The Federal Government must exercise fiscal discipline to address the deficit problem. If we allow the Federal Government to raise additional revenue through GST this will undermine the discipline needed to address the real cause of the problem. The real cause of the problem is not insufficient revenue. It is the uncontrolled and runaway operating expenditure. The Edge provided a useful analysis: [1]

In 2012, the Federal Government revenues crossed RM200 billion for the first time but expenditure also for the first time crossed RM250 billion. The Federal Government collected RM207.913 billion, an increase of 12.1% from 2011. Income tax revenue increased by 13.9%, customs duties by 6.4%, petroleum income tax by 22.3%. However, the federal operating expenditure for 2012 was RM207.91275 billion and RM46.932 billion for the development budget. The government has since 1999 been on a spending binge and government finances deteriorated. Although revenue was sufficient to cover operating expenditure it was insufficient to meet the development expenditure needs. The Federal Government had to finance the difference through borrowing. This has resulted in 14 consecutive years of budget deficit which by 2012 had ballooned to RM501.617 billion amounting to 53.50% of GDP.

From 1988 to 1997 the surplus of government revenue to operating expenditure grew every year. It peaked at RM21 billion in 1995. During this period, operating costs were kept in check. From 1970 to 1999 total federal operating expenditure increased from RM2.2 billion to RM45 billion. This is over 30 years. In the 13 years after 1999, operating expenditure has shot up to RM207 billion. The biggest single year increase was 2008 when operating expenditure jumped by 29%.  The total operating expenditure last year rose 13%.
The largest component of the operating expenditure is emoluments with pensions and gratuity, it accounts for 36%. From RM18 billion in 1999, it now stands at more than RM74 billion, growing at a compound rate of 11.5%. In 2008 civil servants’ payroll grew 26% and last year by 20%. Salary increases are permanent and will lead to higher pensions and gratuity payments later.

Subsidies account for 21% of the total operating expenditure. It grew from RM1.1 billion in 1999 to RM44.1 billion in 2013 at a shocking compound growth rate of 33%. In the 28 years from 1970 to 1997 total subsidies exceeded RM1 billion only on three occasions, 1981 to 1983. In contrast, in 2008 subsidies shot up from RM10.6 billion to RM35.2 billion.

From 1999 to 2012, supplies and services grew from RM6.1 billion to RM32 billion. In 1986, the amount was only 2.6 billion. In other words, for the 13 years before 1999, the amount grew 135%.  For the same period of 13 years after 1999, the amount exploded by 425%.

If the expenditure had been put to good use and provided good returns the rising expenditure could have been justified. However, a look at any of the Auditor-General’s Reports for these past 13 years will show the substantial leakages, wastages and corruption. The leakages and wastages is estimated between RM28 billion to RM40 billion a year. Providing the Federal Government with an additional stream of revenue will not solve the fiscal deficit problem. The estimated net revenue generated from the 6% GST is only RM3.87 billion. The deficit problem can only be resolved by instituting cuts in the operating expenditure and ending the leakages, wastages and corruption. Any gain from GST will be undone if the wastage, leakages and corruption continue unchecked. On the same day that GST was being debated the Auditor-General’s 2013 Report was put on the MPs table. It highlighted weaknesses in improper payment, unreasonable delays in completing contracts, unreasonable prices and made 109 recommendations for correction. These recommendations will now gather dust because there is GST to provide the money to carry on the squandering and profligacy. 

With parliament having allowed GST, there will be no incentive to rein in excessive expenditure and the leakages. A government typically prefers to allow higher spending than making the hard decision to cut expenditure. Those supporting GST would typically acquiesce to higher rates of GST from time to time. There is no more toxic economic potion than the mixture of executive need for increased spending, rubber-stamping parliament acquiescence and the adoption of GST. Greece is an example of what can happen. Access to a powerful revenue raiser like VAT could not protect it from financial crisis when it lacked the discipline to cut expenditure. The situation is like the Government is filling up a bucket of water with a hole in it. Parliament instead of asking the Government to patch up the hole gives it a second pipe. The hole will never be repaired. Parliament in sparing the rod is spoiling the BN Government.  

Further, GST will exacerbate rather than solve the problem of too much government borrowing. Barisan Nasional MPs like Jasin argued that Malaysia should adopt GST because 160 countries have done so. Countries that have to be bailed out, as well as those teetering on the edge of fiscal collapse - including Greece, Spain, Portugal, Ireland and Italy - all have GST. Prior to the 1960s, before the introduction of GST, the European countries had debts on a percentage of GDP below that of the United States of America. Since the introduction of GST, the average debt level of these Western European countries is higher than the US debt level. According to IMF, the public debt of USA is 106% of its GDP, Greece – 158%, Spain – 84%, Portugal – 123%, Ireland – 117%, Italy – 126%, Japan – 208% and Singapore – 111%. For all intents and purpose, the experience in Europe confirms Milton Friedman’s famous warning that:

“In the long run government will spend whatever the tax system will raise, plus as much more as it can get away with.”

Based on the experience of the 160 countries GST will not solve the fiscal problems but in fact will make it worse.

The 2nd Reason: GST will lead to harmful effects on the economy
GST will cause consumption to be reduced, lower the GDP and Malaysians will be worse off. GST being a tax on consumption will reduce consumption and lead to a negative effect on the GDP.

At the initial rate of 6%, the impact will be painful but tolerable. However, IMF in its March 2014 Report said that the 6% GST rate is low because it is only a starting point. At 6% it will not have a significant impact on the Government’s revenue and will have to be increased after the tax is operational. IMF said that in fact many countries have increased the GST rates after its introduction.

Based on the experience of the ten largest countries that adopted GST, the average GST rate has risen from 10.7% at inception to 16%, an increase of more than 50%. The average rate of the Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) is 18%. The United Kingdom increased to 20% in January 2011.

For GST to generate higher revenue, a combination of base broadening and rate hikes have to be considered. These measures will in turn mean a higher impact on growth. Once the rate is increased it will have a negative impact on the GDP. The increased rates will increase the consumers’ burden through higher consumer prices. As a result private consumption will fall. By increasing prices GST will reduce real wages.

Ernst & Young in a 2010 study “The Macroeconomic Effects of an Add-on Value Added Tax” prepared for the National Retailers Federation of the United States found that an add-on VAT of 10% enacted to reduce the deficit would result in a loss of 850,000 jobs, a loss of US$260 billion in retail spending and a 2% drop in the GDP in the year of enactment.

Malaysia will not suffer such losses but the risk of a significant negative impact is there. GST will kill the golden goose which is private consumption in Malaysia. According to the 2013/2014 Economic Report consumption or domestic demand is the key driver of growth led by private consumption and investments. The Government is relying on private consumption supported by household spending to lead GDP growth. GST will dampen this growth. This is clear following the effect of structural adjustment measures such as subsidy rationalization. The Nielsen Consumer Confidence Index for the 4th Quarter of 2013 dropped 98 points, the lowest in three years. Over a third of the Malaysian consumers surveyed cited the economy as a concern followed by increased in food prices (24%). MIER also reported its Consumer Sentiments Survey and Business Conditions Survey plunged to the lowest in five years. MIER warned that with the emerging weaknesses in consumer spending domestic demand will be affected. Due to the economy facing serious challenges with the slow recovery from   global recession and the unsettling effects of quantitative easing, the effects of subsidy rationalization and implementation of minimum wages, the adoption of GST will be too much of a shock to our system and may very well be the proverbial “final straw”.    

The 3rd Reason: GST will hurt the Lower and Middle Classes
GST is a highly regressive tax, hitting lower and middle classes much harder than wealthy families. GST will put further financial stress on the 56% of Malaysian households whose monthly income is less than RM3,000. GST will result in an increase in the tax burden of the middle-income families. GST-induced price hikes would compel households to search for cheaper goods and services. However, 60% of the Malaysian households will find it difficult to substitute basic necessities and essential services. The Federal Government in an attempt to reduce the regressivity of GST has provided for exemptions and zero-rating for certain basic goods for the poor. However, the World Bank in a paper entitled “Value Added Taxation: Mechanism, Design and Policy Issues” in acknowledging that VAT (GST) is inherently regressive stated that attempts to reduce it though exemptions and zero rates have proven ineffective. It is indeed impossible to do so because one cannot segregate food, goods and services consumed by the poor from those consumed by the rich.

In any event, it appears the Federal Government has not carried out an in-depth study of the foods and services that would reduce the GST burden of the poor. The Federal Government in the list of zero-rated foods included trout, Pacific salmon, Atlantic salmon and Danube salmon, Norway lobster, rock lobster, crayfish and oysters while canned sardines, baked beans and instant noodles are liable for the full tax.

The apparent mismatch in the zero-rated items reveals the Government’s poor sensitivities and lack of knowledge of the people’s needs. The GST regime reminds one of the saying attributed to Marie Antoinette, Queen of Louis XVI of France. Upon being informed that the citizens of France had no bread to eat she replied with “let them eat cake.” The French revolutionaries didn’t think too much of her idea of “People First Performance Now” and put her to the guillotine. What shall we do with ours?

Conclusion
Subsidy rationalization and GST are the chickens coming back to roost for Malaysians. Malaysians have voted BN to rule for 56 consecutive years ignoring their extravagance, recklessness, wastefulness and corruption. The future generations of Malaysians will have to pay for the sins of their fathers and mothers unless we can win over the 47% who retained BN before the next elections. It is hoped that the pinch in their wallet will wake them up.      
          



[1] Against the Wind: Fixing the budget deficit is critical and it requires a political consensus by Tong Kooi Ong and Chan Jian Ming The Edge 20 October 2013

Monday, December 23, 2013

Everybody Wants to Change Malaysia but Nobody Wants to Change Himself



Merdeka Center reported on 22nd December 2013 that Prime Minister Najib’s approval rating of 52% is an all-time low compared to the 65% when he launched the New Economic Model (“NEM”). The NEM was a response to Anwar Ibrahim’s New Economic Agenda replacing affirmative action based on race with one based on needs.

After two pre-election budgets when Christmas came early, the post-election budget has turned Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak from Santa Claus to the Grinch that stole Christmas.

Many (the 51% that voted Pakatan Rakyat) seek solace from the crippling price hikes in the thought that economic hardship will knock some sense into those who retained BN in power (the 43% including the newly minted voters of foreign origins) to mend the error of their ways in the next General Elections. I was also of the same mind until I read the words printed on my son’s T-shirt:

“Everybody wants to change the world but nobody wants to change himself”

This, I discovered, is a quote by Leo Tolstoy, author of “War and Peace” and “Anna Karenina”. His book, “The Kingdom of God Is Within You” and idea of non-violent resistance have been acknowledged by Mohandas Gandhi and Dr Martin Luther King Jr. to have inspired and influenced them in their struggle against oppression.

This quote struck me that no matter how bad the economy is going to be, we are not going to change Malaysia, not the next GE and the GEs to come, if we, Malaysians, do not first change ourselves.  We cannot hope for a multicultural and equitable society, if we do not first get rid of the racial prejudices within us.


We have never been one Malaysia, we have as many different Malaysia as there are ethnic groups, each living separate lives. Each group has no real idea how the others live. Malaysians have been separated and segregated in a manner that discourages peoples of different ethnicity to interact with each other in a meaningful and positive way. Fifty-six years of racial politics has poisoned, dehumanized and desensitized us. We cannot remove BN, if we cannot remove the fear and ignorance UMNO instilled in the 47%.  We cannot remove the fear and ignorance, if we cannot remove the prejudices, preconceptions and preconditions in us. To do so we must firstly know how ethnicity is used, organized and structured by UMNO to mobilize political support. The events this December is instructive.

As leaders of the world gathered in South Africa to pay homage to Nelson Mandela who fought racial discrimination, leaders of UMNO gathered in Malaysia to pay homage to Ketuanan Melayu. The unkindest cut to Nelson Mandela’s memory is the shameless comparison in likening UMNO’s Ketuanan Melayu to Mandela’s struggle against apartheid.  As Tengku Adnan said playing the race card at BN party meetings are normal.
The UMNO General Assembly is the annual tribal gathering for ritual racial diatribe, ethnic histrionics and minority bashing. It is the yearly affirmation of historical legacies of mistrust, the reinforcement of the mentality of victimization and the propping up of feelings of shared deprivation.

UMNO Youth Exco member, Fathul Bari, told delegates there is nothing to worry if people called UMNO racists because “we are only protecting our rights”.  Penang UMNO Bukit Mertajam division chief, Musa Sheikh Fadzir wants the 1Malaysia slogan to be replaced by 1Melayu to teach non-Malays a lesson for ditching BN in the 13th GE. UMNO Youth Chief, Khairy Jamaluddin condemned non-Malay companies for not hiring Malay chief executives.

At last year’s assembly, Tokyo UMNO club representative, Ariff Yassir Zulkafli sang “Lagu Warisan” the lyrics translated to English is as follows:

“A small child plays with fire
A desolate heart burns
Tears, blood and sweat (yet)
His land belongs to outsiders”

It is the signature song of Malay patriots yearning for a return to the Malay motherland free of pendatang. The song became the emotional and psychological high point of the assembly bringing tears to the delegates who joined in spontaneous rendition. But nothing is comparable to Hishamuddin Hussein Onn brandishing his keris to cries from the delegates not to just wave it but to use it.

Dr Lim Teck Ghee has observed that “Lagu Warisan” and the keris waving encapsulates the UMNO mind and mentality in propagating the doctrine of “Blood and Soil” nationalism. Blood and soil nationalism refers to an ideology that focuses on ethnicity based on two factors- descent and homeland.

David A. Lakefield and Donald Rothchild in “Containing Fear: Origins and Management of Ethnic Conflict” said competition for resources lies at the heart of ethnicity. Property rights, jobs, scholarships, educational admissions, language rights, government contracts and development allocations all confer benefits on individuals. All such resources are scarce and thus, become objects of competition. Where ethnicity becomes the basis for identity, group competition becomes a struggle along ethnic lines. Politics matter because the state controls access to scarce resources. Groups that possess political power gain privileged access to goods and benefits. The groups struggling for political power compete on their visions of just, legitimate and appropriate political orders.

 John M. Richardson and Shinjini Sen in “Ethnic Conflict and Economic Development” explained that in a typical scenario, leaders of a dominant ethnic group gain office and then use state institutions to distribute economic and political benefits preferentially to their ethnic brethren. Discrimination against subordinate groups, often portrayed as less deserving human beings, accompanies this preferential treatment. When force is needed to impose discriminatory practices and quell subordinate group resistance, it is exercised by police officers and soldiers recruited almost exclusively from the dominant group, who often view themselves as “ethnic soldiers”. In democracies, a dominant group that is a majority often uses its voting power to entrench discriminatory practices by legal or quasi legal means. When a dominant group is the minority, it typically imposes discriminatory policies by force as in apartheid South Africa.

Historical legacies of mistrust, a mentality of victimization and feelings of shared deprivation make group members more receptive to simplistic appeals from extremist leaders and encourage those vying to be leaders to make such appeals.

Nelson Mandela and FW de Klerk in South Africa have shown how courageous leadership can reduce ethnic tensions. Unfortunately, political leaders in a diverse society more often than not are less courageous. Such political leaders play a divisive role by appealing to ethnic sentiments and use rival groups as scape-goats in order to enhance personal political power and win or retain political office.

Historical legacies of mistrust are used to kindle and stoke present day fires based on memories of “ancient hatreds”. In the Middle East, ethnic differences are traced to biblical times. In Northern Ireland, historical clashes between Protestants and Catholics are relived in annual festivals that often become violent. Sri Lanka school children are reminded of the pivotal clash between Sinhalese Prince Dutugemunu and Tamil King Elaric that re-established Singhalese dominance on the island. For Serbians and Croatians, the incursions into Europe of Ottoman Sultans are a living reality along with the ethnically divisive policies of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the atrocities instigated by ethnic based regimes.

A victim mentality helps to unite group members behind their leaders and justifies present sacrifices. Moreover, members of a victimized group feel justified in victimizing others. In South Africa, white Afrikaners viewed themselves as victims of British colonialism redeemed by ruling over the inferior Blacks, Indians and Coloreds. In Sri Lanka, Sinhalese majority also viewed themselves as victims. They resented the favorable treatment given to Tamils under colonial rule. In the words of world historian K.M. de Silva, the Sinhalese were a “majority with a minority complex”. This attitude fueled political support for Sinhalese nationalist leaders whose policies convinced many Tamils there was no alternative to secession ending in a disastrous tragedy for all.

Relative deprivation is a perception that due to the historical legacies of mistrust and victimization mentality, the members of the group believe they are not being provided the benefits to which they are justly entitled. Feelings of relative deprivation are intensified not only when benefits including political, religious and language rights as well as economic well-being decline but also when expectations increase. Feelings of deprivation resulting from declining benefits or unrealized expectations will be interpreted as an ethnically motivated injustice. It is this relative deprivation that justifies the ethnically motivated leader to re-establish a “more equitable social-economic order”. In Sri Lanka, both S.W.R.D. and Sirimavo Bandaranaike won democratic elections by appealing to Buddhist-Sinhalese nationalist sentiments and denigrating ethnic Tamils. In the United States, appealing to white racist sentiments is a staple of political campaigning in racially divided Southern states. Similar tactics were used by leaders such as Slobodan Milosevic, of Serbia and General Tudjman of Croatia who won their presidencies by appealing to the most divisive aspects of Serbian and Croatian nationalism.

John M Richardson and Shinjini Sen were referring to Rwanda, Serbia, Croatia, Sri Lanka and Ethiopia but Malaysians will easily recognized the same things are happening in Malaysia.

On 14 September 2013, Prime Minister Najib reversed the NEM following pressure from right wing extremist group Perkasa, to launch the Bumiputra Economic Empowerment Programmes. Najib’s experiment in moderate politics ended when he declared:

“Therefore, the Malays and Bumiputras as the core of the national agenda could not be denied by anybody, indeed, any matter which is national in nature, which does not take into account or neglect the agenda of the Malays and Bumiputras is not fair and just”

“…[for] the support given by Malays and Bumiputras at the 13th General Election recently, today the government decides to make a big shift to implement concrete and total strategies and approaches.”

“... All these we undertake to look after the lot of the Malay and Bumiputra communities, since the past, presently and forever.”

David A. Lake and Donald Rothchild said ethnic conflict is most often caused by collective “fears of the future, lived through the past”. They suggest it is important to reassure the different groups of both their physical and cultural security by demonstrations of respect and confidence building measures. In Malaysia there is no chance of this happening because we are not dealing with just individual racism but also institutional racism.

Administrative officers often are at the very least sympathetic to the UMNO cause. The close relationship between the bureaucracy and the party date back to UMNO’s founding. In the 1955 elections, 80% of the UMNO candidates were former officials of the civil service. Of the seven Malays in Tunku Abdul Rahman’s cabinet, six were former civil servants. Based on complains received, the Birotata Negara civics course train graduates to implement racists and religious discriminating policies. In the Mid-Term Review of the Ninth Malaysia Plan, it is reported that 1,016,749 participants benefitted from the BTN programmes.

Those who viewed the “Listen, Listen, Listen” video will note the majority of the students applauded Suara Wanita 1Malaysia president, Sharifah Zohra Jabeen Syed Shah Miskin’s castigation of Bawani, the lone objector to Sharifah’s arguments. The others, Bawani said, were too fearful to stand up and speak out for their rights.

To counter ethnic politics, right thinking Malaysians must break the chains of fear and ignorance holding back the 47%. Malaysians have to undergo a personal internal reformation. Pakatan Rakyat holding more public rallies and giving speeches will come to naught if Malaysians are unable to make this internal reform. This is the key factor. We have to make this change in order to touch the hearts of those UMNO are holding in their grasp.

Lip-service and fine cosmetic words cannot do it. We must remember “out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks”, means that not only our words but our attitudes toward each other must come from our genuine heart-felt feelings. All the talk of wanting our country to change will not happen if our emotions and feelings toward another of a different race are not changed. The most effective and lasting change in racial politics can only take place when we reform in our hearts. It is not our mind that so much needs to change as our heart, to excise the prejudgment, preconceived notions and predisposition we have of another race. There must be a paradigm shift in us. This type of change emerges from an understanding and practice of genuine justice.

Genuine justice is based on fairness. John Rawls in his book “A Theory of Justice” advocated distributive justice to compensate for social and economic inequalities. Thus genuine justice is based on need. Racism on the other hand is nothing but the systemic indifference justified by biological or cultural differences. Since people’s needs differ due to differing socio-historical circumstances, true justice spring from what they need. Oliver Wendell Homes said:

“There is no greater inequality than the equal treatment of unequals”

At the heart of justice is affirmative action based on need. It is based on the principle of redress that undeserved inequalities call for rectification. Since inequalities of birth are undeserved these inequalities must be compensated for. Therefore in order to treat all persons equally and provide genuine equality of opportunity, society must give more attention to those born into or placed in less favourable social-economic positions. It cannot be based on discredited and debunked notions of racial supremacy or inferiority. It is only when Malaysians can get to this point will Malaysia be able to change.

To get to this point requires compassion. Compassion is the counter to racism. At the heart of compassion lies “respect” the process whereby the other person is treated with deference, courtesy and compassion in an endeavour to safeguard the integrity, dignity, value and social worth of the individual. It means treating people they way they want to be treated.

To counter UMNO’s racial politics, Malaysians have to find the compassion to reach out to the less fortunate Malays and Bumiputras especially those in the rural areas and in the interior of Sabah and Sarawak. The best way to unmask the racial lies and clean up bigotry is to show Malaysia is a caring society assisting all irrespective of race or religion. I commend the Rotary Club of Petaling Jaya in organizing a health clinic in Batu Arang village where all residents in need irrespective of race were given free health, dental and eye sight tests. If more follow this example, Malaysians’ long walk to freedom will be one more step closer to its destination.


William Leong Jee Keen
Member of Parliament for Selayang
23 December 2013